Propuesta de Categorías Para la Medición de la Sustentabilidad Portuaria a Través de la Metodología FuzzyDelphi
Keywords:
Sustentabilidad portuaria, medición de la sustentabilidad, metodología Fuzzy-Delphi
Abstract
La investigación relacionada con la sustentabilidad portuaria es de relevancia dada la importancia del transporte marítimo en el comercio internacional y de los puertos como interface entre los distintos modos de transporte y generadores de valor dentro de las cadenas globales de suministro. Por lo tanto, el propósito de este trabajo es identificar las categorías que permitan medir la sustentabilidad portuaria dentro de las dimensiones económica, social y ambiental de manera integral, pues existe un sesgo hacia los temas ambientales y económicos que limitan el avance hacia puertos sustentables. Para ello se compararon tres propuestas con enfoque sustentable, de las similitudes encontradas se determinaron categorías que fueron evaluadas con la metodología Fuzzy-Delphi para reducir la ambigüedad y la incertidumbre en su elección. Resultado de la aplicación de la metodología mencionada se identificaron las categorías a partir de las cuales es posible medir la sustentabilidad portuaria de manera integral.
Research related to port sustainability is relevant, given the importance of maritime transport in international trade and of ports as an interface between different modes of transport and value generators within global supply chains. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to identify the categories that allow port sustainability to be measured within the economic, social, and environmental dimensions in an integrated approach, as there is a bias toward environmental and economic issues that limit progress toward sustainable ports. For this purpose, three proposals with a sustainable approach were compared, and from the similarities found, categories were determined that were evaluated with the Fuzzy-Delphi methodology to reduce ambiguity and uncertainty in their choice. As a result of the application of the aforementioned methodology, the categories from which it is possible to measure port sustainability integrally were identified.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
PlumX Statistics
References
1. Acciaro, M. (2015). Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics: research and applications, 18 (3), 291-311.
2. Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., Lam, J., y Kapros, S. (2014). Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(5), 480-500.
3. Argyriou, I., Daras, T., Tsoutsos, T. (2022). Challenging a sustainable port. A case study of Souda port, Chania, Crete. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10, 2125-2137.
4. Asgari, N., Hassani, A., Jones, D., y Nguye, H. (2015). Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: methodology and case study. Transportation Research part E, 78, 19-39.
5. Balbaa, A., y Liyanage, J. (2010). On the Development of an Integrated Framework Based on ‘PERS’ and ‘EFQM’ for Environmental Sustainability Management in Seaports: A Case from Egypt. En Amadi-Echendu, J., Brown, K., Willett, R., y Mathew, J. (Ed.). (297-310). Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management. Londres: Springer.
6. Bergqvist, R., Macharis, C., Meers, D., y Woxenius, J. (2015). Making hinterland transport more sustainable a multi actor multi criteria analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 14, 80-89.
7. Bjerkan, K., Hansen, L., y Steen, M. (2021). Towards sustainability in the port sector: The role of intermediation in transition work. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 296-314.
8. Bouzon, M., Govindan, K., Taboada, C., y Campos, L. (2016). Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP. Resources, Conversation and Recycling, 108, 182-197.
9. Burškytė, V., y Belous, O. (2012). Klaipeda seaports key sustainability. Baltic International Symposium.
10. Denktas-Sakar, G., y Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012). Port Sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: a framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28 (3), 301-320.
11. Dinwoodie, J., Tuck S., Knowles, H., Benhin, J., y Sansom, M. (2012). Sustainable development of maritime operations in ports. Business Strategy and the environment, 21, 111-126.
12. Dwarakish, G., y Salim, A. (2015). Review on the role of ports in the development of a nation. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 295-301.
13. Global Reporting Initiative [GRI] (2022). Guía para la elaboración de memorias de sostenibilidad G4. http://www.mas-business.com/docs/Spanish-G4.pdf
14. Hiranandani, V. (2014). Sustainable development in seaports: a multi-case study. Marit Affairs, 13, 127-172.
15. Ho, Y., y Wang, H. (2008). Applying Fuzzy Delphi Method to Select the Variables of a Sustainable Urban System Dynamics Model. Actas del 26o. Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad de la Dinámica de Sistemas (International Conference of the System Dynamics Society). Disponible en https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1806/6d728afe777dd35939367bcec3ef84e344e8.pdf
16. Hossain, T., Adams, M, Y Walker, T. (2021). Role of sustainability in global seaports. Ocean and Costal Management, 202, 1-10.
17. Hsu, Y., Lee, C., y Kreng, V. (2010). The application of fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy ahp in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Experts Systems with Applications, 37, 419-425.
18. Iannone, F. (2012). The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research, 46, 1424-1448.
19. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tatsuta, R., y Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241-253.
20. Kabir, G., y Sultana, R. (2013). Integrating fuzzy delphi with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for multiple criteria inventory classification. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 3(1), 22-34.
21. Lavissière, A., Mandják, T., Hofmann, J., y Fedi, L. (2020). Port marketing as manifestation of sustainable marketing in a B2B context. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 524-536.
22. Le, X., Vu, V., Hens, L., y Van Heur, B. (2014). Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 173-193.
23. Lee, J., y Notteboom, T. (2014). The greening of ports: a comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews, 34(2), 169-189.
24. Parola, F., y Maugeri, S. (2013). Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: towards a research agenda. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 114-122.
25. Pavlic, B., Cepak, F., Sucic, B., Peckej, M, y Kandus, B. (2014). Sustanable port infraestructura, practical implementation of the Green port concept. Thermal Science, 18(3), 938-948.
26. Peris-Mora, E., Diez, J., Subirats, A., Ibañez, S., y Alvarez, P. (2005). Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 1649-1660.
27. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Casal, J., y Darbra, R. (2015). Tool for the identification and assessment of Environmental Aspects in Ports (TEAP). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 113, 8-17.
28. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., y Darbra, R. (2014). Identification and selection of Environmental Performance Indicators for sustainable port development. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 81, 124-130.
29. Reguant-Álvarez, M., y Torrado-Fonseca, M. (2016). El método Delphi. REIRE: Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9(1), 87-102.
30. Roh, S., Thai, V., y Wong, Y. (2016). Towards Sustainable ASEAN Port Development: Challenges and Opportunities for Vietnamese Ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(2), 107-118.
31. Saengsupavanich, C., Coowanitwong, N., Gallardo, W., y Lertsuchatavanich, C. (2009). Environmental performance evaluation of an industrial port and estate: ISO14001, port state control-derived indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 154-161.
32. Sislian, L., Jaegler, P., y Cariou, P. (2016). A literatura review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problema. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19-26.
33. Tancredi, E. (2019). Hacia la sustentabilidad ambiental en el transporte marítimo de mercancías. La relación entre los compromisos del Acuerdo de París, los Objetivos de la Agenda 2030 y las normas de la Organización Marítima Internacional frente a los desafíos del cambio climático. Red Sociales, Revista del Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, 6(03), 3-30.
34. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD] (2009). Review of Maritime Transport 2009. Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas Sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. Organización de Naciones Unidas. Ginebra. Disponible en http://unctad.org/es/Docs/rmt2009_sp.pdf
35. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD] (2015). Review of Maritime Transport 2015. Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas Sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. Organización de Naciones Unidas. Ginebra. Disponible en http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2015_en.pdf
36. Vega, M., Bearzotti, L., Escobedo, Y. y González-Ramírez, R. (2018). Una propuesta de indicadores para el análisis de la sustentabilidad en puertos. Panorama Económico, 26(8), 166-185.
37. Villafán, K. y Valencia, N. (2021). La logística sustentable en los puertos marítimos: caso del puerto de Lázaro Cárdenas. Realidad Económica, 26(68), 13-23.
38. Wang, D., y Zhao, Y. (2016). Research on quantitative evaluation indicator system of seaport sustainable development. OCEANS, 1-8.
39. Wang, S., Lee, M., Château, P., y Chang, Y. (2016). Performance indicator framework for evaluation of sustainable tourism in the Taiwan coastal zone. Sustainability, 8(652), 1-13.
40. Wang, Y., Yeo, G., y Ng, A. (2018). The use of the hybrid fuzzy-delphi-topsis approach in identifying optimal bunkering ports for shipping lines. En P., Lee y Z., Yang, (eds.). Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Maritime Studies and Logistics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. (249-270). Cham, Suiza: Springer International Publishing.
41. Yap, W., y Lam, J. (2013). 80 million-twenty-foot-equivalent-unit container port? Sustainability issues in port and coastal development. Ocean & Costal Management, 71, 13-25.
2. Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., Lam, J., y Kapros, S. (2014). Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(5), 480-500.
3. Argyriou, I., Daras, T., Tsoutsos, T. (2022). Challenging a sustainable port. A case study of Souda port, Chania, Crete. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10, 2125-2137.
4. Asgari, N., Hassani, A., Jones, D., y Nguye, H. (2015). Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: methodology and case study. Transportation Research part E, 78, 19-39.
5. Balbaa, A., y Liyanage, J. (2010). On the Development of an Integrated Framework Based on ‘PERS’ and ‘EFQM’ for Environmental Sustainability Management in Seaports: A Case from Egypt. En Amadi-Echendu, J., Brown, K., Willett, R., y Mathew, J. (Ed.). (297-310). Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management. Londres: Springer.
6. Bergqvist, R., Macharis, C., Meers, D., y Woxenius, J. (2015). Making hinterland transport more sustainable a multi actor multi criteria analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 14, 80-89.
7. Bjerkan, K., Hansen, L., y Steen, M. (2021). Towards sustainability in the port sector: The role of intermediation in transition work. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 296-314.
8. Bouzon, M., Govindan, K., Taboada, C., y Campos, L. (2016). Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP. Resources, Conversation and Recycling, 108, 182-197.
9. Burškytė, V., y Belous, O. (2012). Klaipeda seaports key sustainability. Baltic International Symposium.
10. Denktas-Sakar, G., y Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012). Port Sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: a framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28 (3), 301-320.
11. Dinwoodie, J., Tuck S., Knowles, H., Benhin, J., y Sansom, M. (2012). Sustainable development of maritime operations in ports. Business Strategy and the environment, 21, 111-126.
12. Dwarakish, G., y Salim, A. (2015). Review on the role of ports in the development of a nation. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 295-301.
13. Global Reporting Initiative [GRI] (2022). Guía para la elaboración de memorias de sostenibilidad G4. http://www.mas-business.com/docs/Spanish-G4.pdf
14. Hiranandani, V. (2014). Sustainable development in seaports: a multi-case study. Marit Affairs, 13, 127-172.
15. Ho, Y., y Wang, H. (2008). Applying Fuzzy Delphi Method to Select the Variables of a Sustainable Urban System Dynamics Model. Actas del 26o. Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad de la Dinámica de Sistemas (International Conference of the System Dynamics Society). Disponible en https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1806/6d728afe777dd35939367bcec3ef84e344e8.pdf
16. Hossain, T., Adams, M, Y Walker, T. (2021). Role of sustainability in global seaports. Ocean and Costal Management, 202, 1-10.
17. Hsu, Y., Lee, C., y Kreng, V. (2010). The application of fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy ahp in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Experts Systems with Applications, 37, 419-425.
18. Iannone, F. (2012). The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research, 46, 1424-1448.
19. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tatsuta, R., y Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241-253.
20. Kabir, G., y Sultana, R. (2013). Integrating fuzzy delphi with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for multiple criteria inventory classification. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 3(1), 22-34.
21. Lavissière, A., Mandják, T., Hofmann, J., y Fedi, L. (2020). Port marketing as manifestation of sustainable marketing in a B2B context. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 524-536.
22. Le, X., Vu, V., Hens, L., y Van Heur, B. (2014). Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 173-193.
23. Lee, J., y Notteboom, T. (2014). The greening of ports: a comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews, 34(2), 169-189.
24. Parola, F., y Maugeri, S. (2013). Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: towards a research agenda. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 114-122.
25. Pavlic, B., Cepak, F., Sucic, B., Peckej, M, y Kandus, B. (2014). Sustanable port infraestructura, practical implementation of the Green port concept. Thermal Science, 18(3), 938-948.
26. Peris-Mora, E., Diez, J., Subirats, A., Ibañez, S., y Alvarez, P. (2005). Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 1649-1660.
27. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Casal, J., y Darbra, R. (2015). Tool for the identification and assessment of Environmental Aspects in Ports (TEAP). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 113, 8-17.
28. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., y Darbra, R. (2014). Identification and selection of Environmental Performance Indicators for sustainable port development. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 81, 124-130.
29. Reguant-Álvarez, M., y Torrado-Fonseca, M. (2016). El método Delphi. REIRE: Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9(1), 87-102.
30. Roh, S., Thai, V., y Wong, Y. (2016). Towards Sustainable ASEAN Port Development: Challenges and Opportunities for Vietnamese Ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(2), 107-118.
31. Saengsupavanich, C., Coowanitwong, N., Gallardo, W., y Lertsuchatavanich, C. (2009). Environmental performance evaluation of an industrial port and estate: ISO14001, port state control-derived indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 154-161.
32. Sislian, L., Jaegler, P., y Cariou, P. (2016). A literatura review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problema. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19-26.
33. Tancredi, E. (2019). Hacia la sustentabilidad ambiental en el transporte marítimo de mercancías. La relación entre los compromisos del Acuerdo de París, los Objetivos de la Agenda 2030 y las normas de la Organización Marítima Internacional frente a los desafíos del cambio climático. Red Sociales, Revista del Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, 6(03), 3-30.
34. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD] (2009). Review of Maritime Transport 2009. Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas Sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. Organización de Naciones Unidas. Ginebra. Disponible en http://unctad.org/es/Docs/rmt2009_sp.pdf
35. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD] (2015). Review of Maritime Transport 2015. Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas Sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. Organización de Naciones Unidas. Ginebra. Disponible en http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2015_en.pdf
36. Vega, M., Bearzotti, L., Escobedo, Y. y González-Ramírez, R. (2018). Una propuesta de indicadores para el análisis de la sustentabilidad en puertos. Panorama Económico, 26(8), 166-185.
37. Villafán, K. y Valencia, N. (2021). La logística sustentable en los puertos marítimos: caso del puerto de Lázaro Cárdenas. Realidad Económica, 26(68), 13-23.
38. Wang, D., y Zhao, Y. (2016). Research on quantitative evaluation indicator system of seaport sustainable development. OCEANS, 1-8.
39. Wang, S., Lee, M., Château, P., y Chang, Y. (2016). Performance indicator framework for evaluation of sustainable tourism in the Taiwan coastal zone. Sustainability, 8(652), 1-13.
40. Wang, Y., Yeo, G., y Ng, A. (2018). The use of the hybrid fuzzy-delphi-topsis approach in identifying optimal bunkering ports for shipping lines. En P., Lee y Z., Yang, (eds.). Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Maritime Studies and Logistics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. (249-270). Cham, Suiza: Springer International Publishing.
41. Yap, W., y Lam, J. (2013). 80 million-twenty-foot-equivalent-unit container port? Sustainability issues in port and coastal development. Ocean & Costal Management, 71, 13-25.
Published
2023-02-03
How to Cite
Buenrostro Aguilar, H. J., & Simón Domínguez, N. (2023). Propuesta de Categorías Para la Medición de la Sustentabilidad Portuaria a Través de la Metodología FuzzyDelphi. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 19(37), 174. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n37p174
Section
Special Editions
Copyright (c) 2023 Hugo Javier Buenrostro Aguilar, Nadima Simón Domínguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
