Indications et Pronostic de l’Utilisation de la Sonde de Foley dans le Déclenchement du Travail d’Accouchement à la Maternité du CHU Kara, Nord Togo en 2023

Kossi Edem Logbo-Akey; Tina Kétévi; Yendoube Pierre Kambote; Akila Bassowa; Kignomon Bingo M’bortché; Noe Kibandou Patchidi; Dede Regina Ajavon; Abdoul Samadou Aboubakari

doi:10.19044/esj.2023.v19n33p140

Kossi Edem Logbo-Akey Gynécologue-obstétricien, Service de gynécologie-obstétrique du CHU Kara, Togo
Tina Kétévi Gynécologue-obstétricien, Service de gynécologie-obstétrique du CHU Sylvanius Olympio, Lomé, Togo
Yendoube Pierre Kambote Gynécologue-obstétricien, Service de gynécologie-obstétrique du CHU Kara, Togo
Akila Bassowa Gynécologue-Obstétricien, Service de gynécologie-obstétrique du CHU Campus, Lomé, Togo
Kignomon Bingo M’bortché Gynécologue-obstétricien, Clinique ATBEF, Lomé Togo
Noe Kibandou Patchidi CHU Sylvanius Olympio, Lomé, Togo
Dede Regina Ajavon Gynécologue-obstétricien, Service de gynécologie-obstétrique du CHU Kara, Togo
Abdoul Samadou Aboubakari Gynécologue-obstétricien, Service de gynécologie-obstétrique du CHU Kara, Togo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n33p140

Keywords: Déclenchement artificiel du travail, sonde de Foley, CHU Kara

Abstract

Objectifs : déterminer les indications et pronostic de l’utilisation de la sonde de Foley dans le déclenchement de la grossesse à la maternité du CHU Kara, nord Togo en 2023. Méthodologie :il s’agissait d’étude descriptive à recrutement rétrospectif d’une période de 12 mois allant du 01 Juillet 2022 au 31 Juin 2023 à la maternité du CHU Kara. Ont été inclus tous les dossiers des accouchements dans le service suite à la pose de la sonde de Foley durant la période d’étude. Les paramètres étudiés étaient : utilisation de la sonde de Foley, caractéristiques socio-démographiques, indications, pronostic. Résultats : le taux d’utilisation de la sonde de Foley était de 8%. L’âge moyen des gestantes était de 26,9ans, avec des extrêmes de 17ans et 42ans. Elles étaient nullipares (35,5%) et les primipares (22,6%). Les indications étaient dominées par le dépassement de terme et terme prolongé (48,4%) suivis de la prééclampsie (11,3%) et des morts in utéro (9,7%). Le score de Bishop initial était défavorable chez toutes les gestantes. A la chute de sonde, le score de Bishop était favorable dans 77,4% des cas. La sonde seule avait suffi à déclencher le travail dans 31,2% des cas. L’administration d’ocytocine a été nécessaire dans 65,7% des cas pour indure le travail. L’accouchement a été effectué par voie basse dans 74,2 % des cas. Les nouveau-nés avaient un Apgar ≥ 8 dans 80,6% des cas. Conclusion : L’apport de la sonde de Foley dans le déclenchement du travail réduit le taux d’accouchement par césarienne, avec un pronostic maternel et fœtal favorable.

Objectives: To determine the indications and prognosis Foley catheter use in labour induction. Methodology: Retrospective and descriptive study from 01 July 2022 to 31 June 2023 at the Kara University Hospital maternity unit. All deliveries in the department following Foley catheter insertion during the study period were included. Results: The rate of Foley catheter use was 8%. The average age of pregnant women was 26.9 years, with extremes of 17 and 42 years. They were nulliparous (35.5%) and primiparous (22.6%). Indications were dominated by overdue and prolonged terms (48.4%), followed by pre-eclampsia (11.3%) and death in utero (9.7%). The initial Bishop score was unfavorable in all pregnant women. When the catheter was dropped, the Bishop score was favorable in 77.4% of cases. The catheter alone was sufficient to induce labour in 31.2% of cases. Administration of oxytocin was necessary in 65.7% of cases to induce labour. Delivery was vaginal in 74.2% of cases. The newborns had an Apgar ≥ 8 in 80.6% of cases. Conclusion: The use of Foley catheter to induce labour reduces the rate of caesarean delivery, with a favourable maternal and foetal prognosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Battarbee, A.N., Palatnik, A., Peress, D.A., Grobman, W.A. Association of early amniotomy after Foley balloon catheter ripening and duration of nulliparous labor induction. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 128, 592 -597
2. Chen, W., Xue, J., Gaudet, L., Walker, M., Wen, S.W. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2015; 129 (3) : 193–198
3. Cromi, A., Ghezzi, F., Uccella, S., Agosti, M., Serati, M., Marchitelli, G., Bolis, P. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 125: e1–7
4. Cromi, A., Ghezzi, F., Agosti, M., Serati, M., Uccella, S., Arlant, V., Bolis, P. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 338: e1–7
5. Embrey, M.P., Mollisson, B.G. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967;74(1):44-48
6. Gonsalves, H., Al-Riyami, N., Al-Dughaishi, T., Gowri, V., Al-Azri, M., Salahuddin, A. Use of Intracervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Cases of Previous Caesarean Section Experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos University Med J. November 2016 ; 16 (4) : 445–450
7. Gu, N., Ru, T., Wang, Z., Dai,Y., Zheng, M., Xu, B., Hu Y. Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(8): e0136856
8. Jozwiak, M., Rengerink, K.O., Benthem, M., van Beek, E., Dijksterhuis, M.G., de Graaf, I.M., et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 378: 9809: 2095–2103.
9. Kavanagh, J., Kelly, A.J., Thomas, J. Corticosteroids for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD003100.
10. Khotaba, S., Volfson, M., Tarazova, L., Odeh, M., Barenboym, R., Fait, V., Ophir, E., Oettinger, M. Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section using the double balloon device. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. nov 2001;80(11):1041‑2.
11. Kruit, H., Nupponen, I., Heinonen, S., Rahkonen, L. Comparison of delivery outcomes in low-dose and high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor following cervical ripening with a balloon catheter: A retrospective observational cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2022 ; 17(4): e0267400
12. Lamourdedieu, C., Gnisci, A., Marcelli, M., Heckenroth, H., Gamerre, M., Agostini, A. Maturation cervical des utérus unicicatriciels à la sonde de Foley: Etude prospective de 41 patientes. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2015 ; 44 (5) : 426-432
13. Lee, H.H., Huang, B.S., Cheng, M., Yeh, C.C., Lin, I., Horng, H.C., Huang, H.Y., Lee, W.L., Wang, P.H. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020 ; 17(6): 1825
14. Levine, L.D., Bogner, H.R., Hirshberg, A., Elovitz, M.A., Sammel, M.D., Srinivas, S.K. Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 354.e1–8.
15. Levy, R., Kanengiser, B., Furman, B., Ben Arie, A., Brown, D., Hagay, Z.J. A randomized trial comparing a 30- mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191:1632–1636.
16. Lin, M.G., Reid, K.J., Treaster, M.R., Nuthalapaty, F.S., Ramsey, P.S., Lu, G.C. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. sept 2007;110(3):558‑65.
17. Mohaghegh, Z., Siahkal, S.F., Bahmaei, H., Sharifipour, F., Leyli, E.K., Zahedian, M. The effect of dexamethasone on labor induction: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021; 21:563
18. Patabendige1, M., Jayawardane, A. Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey. BMC Res Notes. 2017 ; 10:155
19. Patro-Malysza, J., Marciniak, B., Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B., Bartosiewicz, J., Oleszczuk, J. Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method. Ginekol Pol. 2010 ; 81(1) : 32- 36
20. Pennell, C.E., Henderson, J.J., O’Neill, M.J., McCleery, S., Doherty, D.A., Dickinson, J.E. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG. 2009; 116: 1443–1452
21. Pez, V., Deruelle, P., Kyheng, M., Boyon, C., Clouqueur, E., Garabedian, C. Méthodes de maturation cervicale et déclenchement du travail : évaluation de la sonde simple ballonnet comparée à la sonde double ballonnet et aux prostaglandines. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie. July–August 2018 ; 46 (7–8) : 570-574
22. Rossard, L., Arlicot, C., Blasco, H., Potin, J., Denis, C., Mercier, D., Perrotin, F. Maturation cervicale par sonde à ballonnet sur utérus cicatriciel: étude rétrospective sur trois ans. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2013 ; 42(5) :480‑7.
23. Sentilhes, L., Vayssiere, C., Beucher, G., Deneux-Tharaux, C., Deruelle, P., Diemunsch, P., et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2013; 170(1):25–32.
24. Tsakiridis, I., Mamopoulos, A., Athanasiadis, A., Dagklis, T. Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Birth: A Comparison of 3 National Guidelines. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2018; 73(9):537–543
25. Tuuli, M.G., Keegan, M.B., Odibo, A.O., Roehl, K., Macones, G.A., Cahill, A.G. Progress of Labor in Women Induced with Misoprostol versus the Foley Catheter. J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 September ; 209(3): 237.e1–237.e7
26. de Vaan, M.D.T., Blel, D., Bloemenkamp, K.W.M., Jozwiak, M., Ten Eikelder, M.L.G., de Leeuw, J.W., Oudijk, M.A., Bakker, J.J.H., Rijnders, R.J.P., Papatsonis, D.N., Woiski M., Mol, B.W., de Heus, R. Induction of labor with Foley catheter and risk of subsequent preterm birth: follow-up study of two randomized controlled trials (PROBAAT-1 and -2). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. févr 2021; 57 (2) : 292‑297.
27. Van Baaren, G.J., Jozwiak, M., Opmeer, B.C., Oude Rengerink, K., Benthem, M., Dijksterhuis, M.G.K., and al. Costeffectiveness of induction of labour at term with a Foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (PROBAAT trial). BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 ;120 (8) : 987–995
28. Vaknin, Z., Kurzweil, Y., Sherman, D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied protaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction : a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 ; 203(5) : 418-429
29. West, H.M., Jozwiak, M., Dodd, J.M. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD009792
30. WHO. WHO recommendations for induction of labour.2011. [Internet]. [ cité 21 Juin 2023]. Disponible sur https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241501156
31. Zafran, N., Garmi, G., Zuarez-Easton, S., Nachum, Z., Salim, R. Cervical ripening with the balloon catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth. J Perinatol 2015; 35: 799–802