Unemployment and Digital Labor Platforms in Georgia
Abstract
This article addresses the pressing issues of unemployment and employment in Georgia over the past three decades. With an average unemployment rate of around 20 percent, affecting approximately 300,000 people from 2010 to 2022, the labor force faces significant challenges. The advent of technological progress has highlighted the necessity for novel approaches to the labor market. In this context, digital work platforms have emerged as potential solutions, offering new forms of employment and creating opportunities driven by advancements in digital technologies. The aim of this study is to identify innovative employment opportunities in the context of the current unemployment situation in order to improve the Georgian labor market conjunction. The study draws upon interviews with labor market specialists and presents conclusions based on primary and secondary data. While the research indicates that digital work platforms do not currently play a major role in employment, their significance is projected to grow in the future. The extent of their impact on the population's employment prospects will depend on Georgia's technological development and educational level. These platforms demonstrate the potential to generate flexible jobs and provide supplementary income opportunities. However, challenges associated with their development must be addressed for their successful integration into the labor market.
Downloads
Metrics
References
2. Chernykh E.A. Socio-demographic characteristics and quality of employment of platform workers in Russia and the world. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 172–187. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.11
3. Farrell, D and Greig, F. 2016. “Paychecks, paydays, and the online platform economy: Big data on income volatility” JPMorgan Chase Institute.
4. Howson, K., Johnston, H., Cole, M., Ferrari, F., Ustek-Spilda, F., & Graham, M. (2022). Unpaid labour and territorial extraction in digital value networks. Global Networks, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12407
5. Howson, K., Ferrari, F.,., Salem, N., Johnston, H., Katta, S., Heeks, R., & Graham, M. (2022). Driving the digital value network: Economic geographies of global platform capitalism. Global Networks, 22(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12358
6. Johnston, H., Ergun, O., Schor, J., & Chen, L. Is employment status compatible with the on-demand platform economy: Evidence froma natural experiment. Available at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.northeastern.edu/dist/2/204/ files/2022/02/Johnston-et.-al-2022-Employment-Status-and-Gig-Economy-1.pdf
7. Kvirkvaia, M.; Kikutadze, V.; Sikharulidze, D.; Shaburishvili, S. & Charaia,V. (2018), ‘Study of factors affecting young people’s professional orientation in Georgia’, Globalization & Business. VOL 3. pp. 233–242. https://eugb.ge/index.php/111/article/view/233
8. Kvirkvaia, M. (2023). Digital Work Platforms in the Modern Labor Market. In: Kupiek, M., Brandmeier, R.A. (eds) The Digital Transformation of Georgia. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26451-1_1
9. Kikutadze, V., Kvirkvaia, M., Daghelishvili, N. & Tavkhelidze, T. &. G. G., 2021. COOPERATION BETWEEN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND EMPLOYERS IN GEORGIA”. 10.36172/EKONOMISTI.2021.XVII.02.Kvirkvaia.Kikutadze.Daghelishvili.Tavkhelidze.Gujaraidze
10. Kvirkvaia, M. (2021). Platform work-Georgia. Country profile. https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-06/platform_work_georgia_0.pdf. In European Training Foundation report (ETF): The future of work – New forms of employment in the Eastern Partnership countries: Platform work. https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-07/future_of_work_platform_work_in_eap_countries.pdf.
11. Kvirkvaia, M., 2016. “Analysis of employment and unemployment in municipalities of Georgia”. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/6833 . European Scientific Journal, ESJ, Volume 2, pp. 159-170.
12. Vallas, Steven, and Juliet B Schor. (2020) ‘What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy’, Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273-294.
13. Tsartsidze, 2018. UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE EFFECTIVE EMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS IN GEORGIA UNDER THE MODERN GLOBALIZATION TERMS. Journal of International Economic Research, 4 (1). Pp. 89-95. ISSN 2500-9656.
14. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, (2021) Digital labour platforms in the EU : mapping and business models : final report. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/224624
15. Eurofound (2015), (Authors: Mandl, I., Curtarelli, M., Riso, S., Vargas, O., Gerogiannis, E.) New forms of employment, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
16. Eurofound (2018), Automation, digitization and platforms: Implications for work and employment, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
17. ETF, 2021. European Training Foundation. „THE FUTURE OF WORK. New forms of employment in the Eastern Partnership countries: Platform work. https://www.etf.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/future-work-new-forms-employment-eastern-partnership, Turin: ETF.
18. International Labour Organization. “World Employment Social Outlook 2021: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work.” Ilo.org, 2021. https://ilo.org/ infostories/Campaigns/WESO/World-Employment-Social-Outlook-Report-2021#platform- work/gigs.
19. Pulignano, V., Grimshaw, D., Domecka, M., & Vermeerbergen, L. (2023). Why does unpaid labour vary among digital labour platforms? Exploring socio-technical platform regimes of worker autonomy. Human Relations, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231179901
20. World Economic Forum. 2020. The Promise of Platform Work: Understanding the Ecosystem. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/the-promise-of-platform-work-understanding-the-ecosystem/
Copyright (c) 2023 Murtaz Kvirkvaia, Mogeli Shengelia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
