Indoor Air Quality in Selected School Buildings in the Central Sector of Athens at the Attica’s Region and Potential Health Risks

  • Maria Anna Bikaki Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Georgios Dounias Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Georgios Farantos Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Olga Cavoura Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Ioanna Damikouka Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece
  • Lefkothea Evrenoglou Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Greece
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n37p54
Keywords: Indoor air pollution, school buildings, students, concentration levels, health risks

Abstract

               Aims and Scope: Indoor air pollution is a significant environmental risk factor for health, particularly in schools, where students and teachers spend a considerable portion of their day (about 30%). As a result, they are more exposed to indoor pollution than outdoor air pollution. This paper focuses on investigating the indoor air quality (IAQ) in school buildings within the Central Sector of Athens, in the Attica Region, by recording physical parameters and concentration levels of indoor air pollutants related to comfort, health, and safety conditions within classrooms. The study also seeks to identify factors contributing to diminished air quality in classrooms and propose measures to improve indoor air quality in school buildings to protect public health.  Methods: The indoor air quality research was conducted in forty-seven (47) classrooms across twenty-six (26) school buildings in the Central Sector of Athens, in the Attica Region, from March 2022 to May 2023. Air pollutants, including Carbon dioxide (CO2), Carbon monoxide (CO), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and Particulate matters (PM10, PM2.5), along with physical parameters such as temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH), were monitored using the series 500 Portable Air Quality Monitor (AeroQual) during one teaching hour per day in each classroom. Some windows and doors were opened during sampling due to health and safety measures and recommendations for COVID-19 protection for students and teachers. Findings: The overall mean concentrations of the main parameters recorded inside the schools were 0.136 ppm for CO, 823.38 ppm for CO2, 12.07 ppm for VOCs, 0.006 ppm for NO2, 38.1 μg/m3 for PM10, and 15.4 μg/m3 for PM2.5. The mean recorded temperature was 24.52 oC, and the relative humidity was 45.78%. In this study, twenty- two (22) classrooms, representing 46.8% of the schools in the Attica Region, were found to have temperatures outside the comfort range for students. In all cases, indoor CO concentrations were lower than the recommended exposure limit (REL) of 35 ppm, as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) set by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Eight (8) of the forty-seven classrooms in the Attica region (17%) had CO2 concentrations exceeding 1000 ppm. VOCs exceeded the indoor limit value of 0.8 ppm in all schools (100%). There was a statistically significant difference between indoor and ambient air for CO, CO2, and ΝΟ2 (p<0.001), VOCs (p=0.004), and PM10 (p=0.028). Conclusion: The indoor air quality of the classrooms was influenced by outdoor air, the school’s location, the number of windows opened during lessons, the number of students in the classroom, the activities conducted, the furnishings, and the school equipment. Lack of comfort conditions and exceeded limits of indoor air pollutants can lead to diminished IAQ, thereby posing harmful effects on students. Proper ventilation of classrooms during lessons and breaks is necessary for better air quality. Ventilation is one of the most important factors affecting indoor air quality, as it dilutes exposure to agents originating indoors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Almeida, S.M., Canha, N., Silva, A., Freitas, M.D., Pegas, P., Alves, C., Evtyugina, M., & Pio, C.A. (2011). Children exprosure to atmospheric particles in indoor of Lisbon primary schools.Atmos. Environ. 45, 7594-7599.
2. Alves, C., Nunes, T., Silva, J., & Duarte, M. (2013). Comfort parameters and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in school classrooms and outdoor air, Aerosol Air Qual.Res. 13, 1521–1535.
3. Ashrae (2022). Position Document on Indoor Carbon Dioxide. https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/about/position%20documents/pd_indoorcarbondioxide_2022.pdf
4. Barck, C., Lundahl, J., Hallden, G., & Bylin, G. (2005). Brief exprosures to NO2 augment the allergic inflammation in asthmatics, Environ. Res.97, 58-66.
5. Branis, M. & Safranek, J. (2011). Characterization of coarse particulate matter in school gyms, Environ. Res. 111, 485-491.
6. Canha, N., Mandin, C., Ramalho, O., Wyart, G., Riberon, J., & Dansoville, C. (2016). Assesment of ventilation and indoor air pollutants in nursery and elementary schools in France, Indoor Air 26, 350-365.
7. Choo, C.P. & Jalaludin, J. (2015). An overview of indoor air quality and its impact on respiratory health among Malaysian school-aged children, Rev. Environ. Health 30, 9–18.
8. Daisey, J.M., Angell, W.J., & Apte, M.J. (2003). Indoor air quality, ventilation and health symptoms in schools: an analysis of existing information, Indoor Air 13, 53-64.
9. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the council, of 21 May 2008, on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/air/air-quality/eu-air-quality-standards_en.
10. Gall, E., Cheung, T., Luhung, I., Schiavon, S., & Nazaroff (2016). W.Real-time monitoring of personal exprosures to carbon dioxide. Build. Environ.104, 59-67.
11. Guo, H., Lee, S.C., Chan, L.Y., & Li, W.M. (2004). Risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in different indoor environments, Environ. Res. 94, 57-66.
12. Hänninen, O. & Asikainen, A. (2013). Efficient reduction of indoor exposures. Health benefits from optimizing ventilation, filtration and indoor source controls. THL Report 2/2013. National Institute for Health and Welfare.
13. Heeboll, A., Wargocki, P., & Toftum, J. (2018). Window and door opening behavior, carbon dioxide concentration, temperature and energy use during the heting season in classrooms with different ventilation retrofits-ASHRAE RP124, Sci. Technol. Built Environ. 24, 626-637.
14. Jacklitsch Brenda, K.M. & Jung-Hyun, K. (2016). The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Occupational Exprosure to Heat and Hot environments https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-106
15. Jantunen, M., Oliveira Fernandes, E., Carrer, P., & Kephalopoulos, S. (2011). Promoting actions for healthy indoor air (IAIAQ). Luxembourg: European Comission Directorate General for Health and Consumers.
16. Jones, A.P. (1999). Indoor air quality and health. Atmos, Environ. 33, 4535-4564.
17. Kapalo, P., Meclarova, L., Vilcekova, S., Kridlova Burdova, E., Domnita, F., & Bacotiu, C. (2019). Investigation of CO2 production depending on physical activity of students, Int. J. Environ. Health Res.29, 31-44.
18. Kleinman, M.T. (2000). The Health effects of air pollution on children, Dist.SCAQM (2000) 1-6.
19. Kleipis, N.E., Nelson, W.C., Ott, W.R., Robison, J.P., Tsang, A.M., Switzer. P., Behar, J.V., Hern, S.C., & Engelmann, W.H. (2001). The national human activity pattern survey (nhaps): a resource for assessing exprosure to environmental pollutants. J.Expo, Analysis Environ. Epidemiol. 11,231-252.
20. Kumar, P. & Imam, B. (2013). Footprints of air pollution and changing environment on the sustainability of built infrastructure. Sci. Total Environ., 444, 85–101.
21. Lee, C.W., Dai, Y.T., Chien, G.H., & Hsu, D.J. (2006). Characteristics and health impacts of volatile organic compounds in photocopy centers. Environ. Res. 100, 139-149.
22. Mc Connell, R., Islam, T., Shankardass, K., Jerrett, M., Lurmann, F., Gilliland, F., Gauderman, J., Avol, E., Kunzli, N., Yao, L., Peters, J., & Berhane, K. (2010). Childhood incident asthma and traffic-related air pollution at home and school. Environ. Health Persp.118, 1021-1026.
23. Mendell, M.J. & Heath, G.A. (2005). Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? a critical review of the literature, Indoor Air 15, 27-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00320.x.
24. Mendell, M.J. (2007). Indoor residential chemical emissions as risk factors for respiratory and allergic effects in children: a review, Indoor Air 17, 259-277, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00478.x.
25. Molhave, L. (1990). Volatile Organic Compounds, indoor air quality and health. Indoor Air 1990:4:357-76.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1991.00001.x.
26. Oeder, S., Dietrich, S., Weichenmeier, I., Schober, W., Pusch, G., & J¨orres, R.A. (2012). Toxicity and elemental composition of particulate matter from outdoor and indoor air of elementary schools in Munich, Germany, Indoor Air 22, 148–158.
27. Santamouris, M., Michalakou, G., Patarias, P., Gaitani, N., Sfakianaki, K., & Papagralstra, M. (2007). Using Intelligent clustering techniques to classify the energy performance of school buildings. Energy Build 2007;39:45-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.04.018
28. Schibuola, L., Scarpa, M., & Tambani, C. (2018). CO2 based ventilation control in energy retrofit: an experimental assessment, Energy 143, 606-614.
29. Stabile, L., Buonanno, G., Frattolillo, A., & DELL’ Isola, M. (2019). The effect of the ventilation retrofit in a school on CO2, airborne particles and energy consumptions, Build Environ. 156, 1-11.
30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Student Health and Academic Performance Quick Reference Guide. Available: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/quick-reference-guide-about-student-health-and-academic-performance
31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024). Carbon Monoxide’s Impact on Indoor Air Quality. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/carbon-monoxides-impact-indoor-air-quality (accessed on 11 August)
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024). Nitrogen Dioxide’s Impact on Indoor Air Quality. Αvailable online: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/nitrogen-dioxides-impact-indoor-air-quality (accessed on 11 August)
33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024). National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-pm (accessed on 11 August)
34. U.S Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2024). Available online: https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/183 (accessed on 11 August)
35. WHO (2000). Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, second ed.
36. WHO Regional Office for Europe (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution-REVIHAAP Project, Technical Report.
37. World Health Organization (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (PM2,5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide.
38. Zuraimi, MS. (2010). Is ventilation duct cleaning useful? A review of the scientific evidence. Indoor Air, 20(6):445–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00672.x
Published
2025-01-15
How to Cite
Bikaki, M. A., Dounias, G., Farantos, G., Cavoura, O., Damikouka, I., & Evrenoglou, L. (2025). Indoor Air Quality in Selected School Buildings in the Central Sector of Athens at the Attica’s Region and Potential Health Risks. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 21(37), 54. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n37p54
Issue
Vol 21 No 37 (2025): ESJ Special Edition: Occupational Health and Safety - Modern Policies and Practices
Section
Special Editions

Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Anna Bikaki, Georgios Dounias, Georgios Farantos, Olga Cavoura, Ioanna Damikouka, Lefkothea Evrenoglou

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)