Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Ocular Biometry for Cataract: A Systematic Review

  • Breno Bonadies Andrade Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Glaucia Luciano da Veiga Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Daniela Trovao de Figueiroa Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
  • Felipe Trovao de Figueiroa Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
  • Luiz Gustavo de I. Ribeiro Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Samantha Sanches de Carvalho Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Thais Moura Gascon Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Fernando Betty Cresta Banco de Olhos de Sorocaba, BOS, Sorocaba, Brasil
  • Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Vagner Loduca Lima Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cataract; Biometry; Intraocular lenses; Refractive error

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool in the modernization of ophthalmic practice, particularly in ocular biometrics for cataract surgery. This review explores how AI can optimize the accuracy and personalization of human eye biometrics, which are crucial for diagnosis, surgical planning success, and the reduction of intra- and postoperative complications. The research was conducted through a systematic review using the PRISMA methodology across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eight studies were included that met eligibility criteria, focusing on machine learning tools and other AI approaches. The results show that AI improves the prediction of biometric parameters, such as the power and position of intraocular lenses, in addition to identifying risk factors and optimizing resources, especially in contexts with limited infrastructure. AI-based models outperformed traditional methods, from advanced calculations to accessibility in remote regions. The review concludes that AI has transformative potential in ophthalmology, although challenges such as methodological validation, generalization, and ethical regulation remain. The study's implications include advancements in clinical practice and the need for public policies that promote the ethical and effective use of these technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Clarke G, Kapelner A. The Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Formula for Safe Machine Learning-Based Intraocular Lens Predictions. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(2):12.
2. Zhou Y, Dai M, Sun L, et al. The accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on artificial intelligence in highly myopic eyes. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1123456.
3. Li T, Yang KL, Stein J, Nallasamy N. Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Algorithm for IOL Position Prediction. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(11):17.
4. Connell B, Kane JX. Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019;4(1):e000251.
5. Tabuchi H, Morita S, Miki M, Deguchi H, Kamiura N. Real-time AI evaluation of cataract surgery. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2022;12(2):147–154.
6. Lanza M, et al. Application of AI in analysis of features affecting cataract complications. Front Med. 2020;7:607870.
7. Moher, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, v. 6, n. 7, p. e1000097, 2009.
8. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2021.
9. Long E, et al. Artificial intelligence manages congenital cataract with individualized prediction and telehealth computing. npj Digital Medicine. 2020;3:112
10. Ladas J, et al. Improvement of IOL formulas using AI. 2021.
11. Sim DA, et al. AI in ophthalmology: Improved diagnostic precision. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;84:100965. Müller S, et al. AI in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(1):131.
12. Chang TC, et al. Artificial intelligence in cataract surgery: Current applications and future directions. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021;10(2):187-95.
13. Yilmaz R, et al. Real-time AI vs in-person instruction in cataract surgery training. Sci Rep. 2024;14:15130.
14. Lanza M, et al. Classification Tree Analysis for Postoperative Cataract Complications. Diagnostics. 2021;11(3):436.
15. Brown JM, et al. Predictive Analytics in Ophthalmology: Applications for artificial intelligence in visual outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(7):893-7.
16. Ting DSW, et al. Artificial Intelligence and deep learning in Ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(2):167-75.
17. Mueller A, Thomas BC, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP. Comparison of a new image-guided system for IOL power. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(4):518–524.
18. Vinogradov AR, Balalin SV, Solodkova E. Optimization of IOL power using AI. 2024.
19. Brant AR, et al. AI to improve cataract outcomes in Ethiopian outreaches. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(1):6–10.
20. Ahn, H, et al. Artificial Intelligence for the Estimation of Visual Acuity Using Multi-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomographic Images in Senile Cataract. Frontiers in medicine, 9, 871382
21. Asena BS, et al. Keratometry comparison with VERION system. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(2):391–399.
22. Ahn H, et al. AI estimation of visual acuity using anterior OCT. Front Med. 2022;9:871382.
23. Thomsen AS, et al. Virtual reality simulator performance in cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):307–311.
24. Loftus TJ, et al. AI and Surgical Decision-Making. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(2):148–158.
25. Lee CS, et al. Deep-learning AI in ophthalmology: Trends and applications. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2020;9(2):187–195.
Published
2026-01-08
How to Cite
Andrade, B. B., da Veiga, G. L., de Figueiroa, D. T., de Figueiroa, F. T., de I. Ribeiro, L. G., de Carvalho, S. S., Gascon, T. M., Cresta, F. B., Fonseca, F. L. A., & Lima, V. L. (2026). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Ocular Biometry for Cataract: A Systematic Review. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 49, 43. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/20505
Section
ESI Preprints