Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Ocular Biometry for Cataract: A Systematic Review

  • Breno Bonadies Andrade Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Glaucia Luciano da Veiga Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Daniela Trovao de Figueiroa Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
  • Felipe Trovao de Figueiroa Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
  • Luiz Gustavo de I. Ribeiro Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Samantha Sanches de Carvalho Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Thais Moura Gascon Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Fernando Betty Cresta Banco de Olhos de Sorocaba, BOS, Sorocaba, Brasil
  • Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
  • Vagner Loduca Lima Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brasil
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cataract; Biometry; Intraocular lenses; Refractive error

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool in the modernization of ophthalmic practice, particularly in ocular biometrics for cataract surgery. This review explores how AI can optimize the accuracy and personalization of human eye biometrics, which are crucial for diagnosis, surgical planning success, and the reduction of intra- and postoperative complications. The research was conducted through a systematic review using the PRISMA methodology across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eight studies were included that met eligibility criteria, focusing on machine learning tools and other AI approaches. The results show that AI improves the prediction of biometric parameters, such as the power and position of intraocular lenses, in addition to identifying risk factors and optimizing resources, especially in contexts with limited infrastructure. AI-based models outperformed traditional methods, from advanced calculations to accessibility in remote regions. The review concludes that AI has transformative potential in ophthalmology, although challenges such as methodological validation, generalization, and ethical regulation remain. The study's implications include advancements in clinical practice and the need for public policies that promote the ethical and effective use of these technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

References

1. Ahn, H., Kim, J. H., Lee, D., Kim, H. J., & Park, K. H. (2022). Artificial intelligence for the estimation of visual acuity using multi-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography images in senile cataract. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 871382.
2. Asena, B. S., Koc, M., Uzel, M. M., & Akman, A. (2017). Keratometry comparison with the VERION image-guided system. International Ophthalmology, 37(2), 391–399.
3. Brant, A. R., Hinkle, J., Shi, S., Hess, O., Zubair, T., Pershing, S., & Tabin, G. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in global ophthalmology: Using machine learning to improve cataract surgery outcomes at Ethiopian outreaches. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 47(1), 6–10.
4. Carmona González, D., & Palomino Bautista, C. (2021). Accuracy of a new intraocular lens power calculation method based on artificial intelligence. Eye, 35(2), 517–522.
5. Chang, T. C., Cavuoto, K. M., & Flynn, J. T. (2021). Artificial intelligence in cataract surgery: Current applications and future directions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 10(2), 187–195.
6. Clarke, G. P., & Kapelner, A. (2020). The Bayesian additive regression trees formula for safe machine learning-based intraocular lens predictions. Frontiers in Big Data, 3, 572134.
7. Connell, B., & Kane, J. X. (2019). Comparison of the Kane formula with existing intraocular lens formulas. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 4(1), e000251.
8. Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2024). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.5). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
9. Ladas, J. G., Siddiqui, A. A., Devgan, U., & Jun, A. S. (2015). A 3-D “super surface” combining modern intraocular lens formulas to generate a “super formula” and maximize accuracy. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 31(8), 501–506.
10. Lanza, M., Cennamo, G., Iaccarino, G., et al. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence in the analysis of features affecting cataract surgery complications. Frontiers in Medicine, 7, 607870.
11. Lanza, M., Cennamo, G., Iaccarino, G., et al. (2021). Classification tree analysis for postoperative cataract complications. Diagnostics, 11(3), 436.
12. Li, T., Yang, K. L., Stein, J. D., & Nallasamy, N. (2020). Gradient boosting decision tree algorithm for intraocular lens position prediction. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 9(11), 17.
13. Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., et al. (2020). Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 148–158.
14. Long, E., Lin, H., Liu, Z., et al. (2020). Artificial intelligence manages congenital cataract with individualized prediction and telehealth computing. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 112.
15. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
16. Mueller, A., Thomas, B. C., Auffarth, G. U., & Holzer, M. P. (2016). Comparison of a new image-guided system for intraocular lens power calculation. Current Eye Research, 41(4), 518–524.
17. Müller, S., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in cataract surgery: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 131.
18. Rampat, R., Deshmukh, R., Chen, X., Ting, D. S. W., Said, D. G., Dua, H. S., & Ting, D. S. J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in cornea, refractive surgery, and cataract: Basic principles, clinical applications, and future directions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 10(3), 268–281.
19. Sim, D. A., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Improved diagnostic precision. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 84, 100965.
20. Tabuchi, H., Morita, S., Miki, M., Deguchi, H., & Kamiura, N. (2022). Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology, 12(2), 147–154.
21. Thomsen, A. S. S., Smith, P., Subhi, Y., la Cour, M., Tang, L., Saleh, G. M., & Konge, L. (2017). High correlation between performance on a virtual-reality simulator and real-life cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmologica, 95(3), 307–311.
22. Ting, D. S. W., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 103(2), 167–175.
23. Yilmaz, R., et al. (2024). Real-time artificial intelligence versus in-person instruction in cataract surgery training. Scientific Reports, 14, 15130.
24. Zhou, Y., Dai, M., Sun, L., Tang, X., Zhou, L., Tang, Z., Jiang, J., & Xia, X. (2023). The accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on artificial intelligence in highly myopic eyes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1279718.
Published
2026-01-31
How to Cite
Andrade, B. B., da Veiga, G. L., de Figueiroa, D. T., de Figueiroa, F. T., de I. Ribeiro, L. G., de Carvalho, S. S., Gascon, T. M., Cresta, F. B., Fonseca, F. L. A., & Lima, V. L. (2026). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Ocular Biometry for Cataract: A Systematic Review. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 22(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2026.v22n3p1
Section
ESJ Natural/Life/Medical Sciences

Most read articles by the same author(s)